Admin Forum:What do you want to see here in Founder & Admin Central?

Forums: Admin Forum

→ What do you want to see here in Founder & Admin Central?

Fandom's forums are a place for the community to help other members.
To contact staff directly or to report bugs, please use Special:Contact.

Note: This topic has been unedited for 4648 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

This is a new space...as founder & admins, what would you like to see here specifically geared towards your roles in the community. I'd love to hear everything you are thinking. I hit a few of you up on private chat (and would like to talk with more of you ;) -- but I'd like to keep this thread going so we can refer back to it. So let it rip! --Meighan (help forum | blog) 19:06, June 30, 2011 (UTC)

I think I'd really like to see what's worked best for founders when getting new users. And from admins, I'd like to hear how they got to the point of adminship. I'd also like to see, well, friendliness of course, but users sharing ideas with others and helping them out with the wikis they edit at, and help some wikis get a kick-off. --BassJapas 19:16, June 30, 2011 (UTC)

I like the thinking, Jazzi. --Callofduty4 19:24, June 30, 2011 (UTC)

BassJapas - These are great starting points and ideas. How would you like to see us implement them on our end? On your end you could create forum posts around these questions -- which would be so great to see. ;) What do you think? --Meighan (help forum | blog) 20:44, June 30, 2011 (UTC)

Hmm, well that would be a pretty cool thing to do, I'd just be nervous about grammatical and spelling errors ^.^;

And to implementing them, perhaps a forum/thread titled "Questions for the F/A" or something along those lines, with more in depth explanations about the questions, and of course, sections where people can add more questions and where users can answer those questions. --BassJapas 21:45, June 30, 2011 (UTC)

I also worry about grammatical errors and spelling things wrong too. ;) Ok, so let's do this. I'm actually writing a blog post about and explaining what F/A Central is that should be live tomorrow -- I will ask users to comment there and how about you post a thread here in the forum space asking what's worked best for founders when getting new users? Deal? ;) --Meighan (help forum | blog) 00:04, July 1, 2011 (UTC)

Sounds cool =) --BassJapas 00:21, July 1, 2011 (UTC)

Copyright information

Here is something I would really like to hear from the staff about. What are the rules about what non-free content we can upload to wikia? There's just stuff like "Individual communities may elaborate upon and refine requirements for file uploads." for the licensing help page. Yet massive wikis all over wikia are chock full of copyrighted images - I think the extent to which the site has recently been commercialised is stretching the limits of the fair use claim. There's no checking of what content gets uploaded - how would wikia defend themselves against a court case about this? Perhaps wikia's legal team could chime in on the blogs. What should we, as admins as founders, be doing to control non-free content being uploaded? Apparently it is "our own responsibility to understand and adhere to the license". All wordmarks & backgrounds containing copyrighted imagery surely break the rules; they are not attributed anywhere - yet all of the big wikis do it! Can we have a little clarity on wikia's position?--Acer4666 19:48, July 23, 2011 (UTC)

Most wikis don't have a don't ask, don't tell policy. As long as no copyright infringements have ever been filed against Wikia (I don't think), I don't really feel that this rule is ever taken into account on the field. --
 — Christopher Costello  Talk  Contribs  Community   20:39, July 23, 2011 (UTC)

I know, that's kind of my problem. Wikia is too big of a company to have that sort of policy about the material it gets all its revenue from--Acer4666 20:42, July 23, 2011 (UTC)

I'm not a lawyer (nor do I play one on TV), but there is quite alot of leeway for claiming "fair use" on fan wikis. It basically works like this: if a copyrighted image is uploaded and the source is put in the file description page AND the image is used to promote the subject and not denigrate it, most copyright holders will not pursue a complaint. So, worry about the images that portray the subject negatively (beyond lore or context of the plot of a show) and don't worry too much about images that are designed to show the subject or the article or promote the subject. Sourcing is not strictly needed for practical purposes.

Wikia probably knows this, but can't safely and legally say that explicitly, so they are intentionally vague. Also, some wikis have different general licensing terms (not CC-by-SA). Wikia needs not get too involved in enforcement on individual wikis, otherwise the expectation that they need to police all their wikis will grow and that is probably untenable. -- Fandyllic (talk · contr) 23 Jul 2011 7:48 PM Pacific

One little thing that might help is for members to see some form of copyright warning when performing an upload. Perhaps if there were some sort of system interface message that could appear as if by magic to guide the user … perhaps something like MediaWiki:Uploadtext … if only the Oasis skin were connected to it somehow … — SpikeToronto 20:24, July 24, 2011 (UTC)

Very funny. Yes, I also think the upload popup should have an option controlled by wiki admins to always show the copyright warning and the license template choice. -- Fandyllic (talk · contr) 27 Jul 2011 8:34 AM Pacific

So, is this thing on?

I don't like Wikia being "intentionally vague" in order to cover themselves. They are happy to preach the letter of the law over ownership of content, when it comes to contributors wanting their own work removed from the site - but on this, when it could come off negatively on them, they don't say a word--Acer4666 16:48, July 28, 2011 (UTC)

This thing is on. ;) I am listening as always. I have a meeting with Sannse this week and have it on my list of things to ask her, so I can bring back info to this thread (and another one that is current as well). So I'm listening, it just may not happen immediately. In the meantime, add more of your thoughts here if need be. Thanks guys and I appreciate your patience! --Meighan (help forum | blog) 18:45, July 28, 2011 (UTC)

Many thanks for the response - sorry I just wasn't sure if this was being ignored or anything. Good to know you are considering it, I look forward to the results!--Acer4666 19:38, July 28, 2011 (UTC)

Basically what Fandyllic says above is right on. The copyright info is a little fluid to both protect Wikia and the users. We only intervene when a third party comes to us and expressly asks us in detailed documentation to remove something. Otherwise we do nothing unless it's obviously in bad taste and violates TOU. For the most part companies allow the use of their copyrighted images if they promote their product (what ever that may be) and are not used to slander the brand. We leave it up to each individual community to take care of what should and should not be on their wiki. --Meighan (help forum | blog) 23:32, July 28, 2011 (UTC)

Is that the result of the meeting with Sannse?

You see, little fluid policies don't quite cut it when Wikia is making cold, hard cash out of stuffing the website chock full of commercial advertisements. I don't see how "most companies allow it as long as it's not nasty" translates into "we can make vast amounts of money from ad revenue, on pages full of content from any copyrighted source". It's the responsibility of the admins, but wikia gets the big fat paycheck at the end of the day. love the use of the term "their wiki" in this sense, but watch that switch to "our wiki, you have no claim over it" should the admins want the content they added removed.

Do you see the problems that arrive by being vague and non-specific about this stuff?--Acer4666 00:55, July 29, 2011 (UTC)

(Reset indent)  (Edit conflict) That makes a lot of sense. What you are saying Meighan makes some sense. I mean, images of Chris Evans and Captain America over on that wiki certainly help to promote the movie. But, for those of us who do not operate wikis that are connected to a product, we need to be able to have the option of having Add a photo have the effect of showing the user the contents of MediaWiki:Uploadtext. It would be perfectly okay with me if it started as a little yellow bar, like with the new editor, that popped up to a full view of  MediaWiki:Uploadtext  were one to click on the yellow bar. Seems to me that that would be a good compromise between those who want few words in the Add a photo process, and those who want the full instructions and copyright info to be available. Since the techies have already managed it in the new editor, they should be able to accommodate it in a new Add a photo dialogue. Thanks for listening Meighan! — SpikeToronto 01:05, July 29, 2011 (UTC)

Questions living in multiple forums

I've noticed that some of the questions asked in the Admin forum also apply to the Support Requests forum, so I was planning to modify the Admin forum setup to allow questions to have a header for both forums. Unfortunately, it will require me to edit most of the existing Admin forum posts, because they use the {{Forumheader2}} template incorrectly ("Admin Forum" is hardcoded into Forumheader2, but all the posts were created with "Admin Forum" as the first param which I want to re-use). Forumheader2 appears at the top of all admin forum posts. My plan is to make it so Forumheader2 can take parameters for other forums (up to 2 additional) and will show the navigation aid for any forum the post belongs to, so you can jump between Admin forum or the other forum in a post that shares forums.

Does that make sense? -- Fandyllic (talk · contr) 27 Jul 2011 8:48 AM Pacific

Fandyllic, thank you for running this by the thread...ok, a couple of things: 1). I am a little unclear what you are proposing -- so it would be great to get a clearer idea for me (as someone who is not super verse in techy talk ;). 2). Dopp and I are planning to break the Admin forum into specific categories -- so hold the presses on any immediate changes, please. 3). We'll need some help with this, would you like to help us and be a part of this reorg? --Meighan (help forum | blog) 21:00, July 27, 2011 (UTC)

I'm already involved due to the Logo Creation Wiki merge, I think. But, I think I'll wait until most of the changes are done. What I'm proposing may not be necessary or will need to be re-planned after the upcoming changes anyway.

In the meantime, you might want to have one of your tech people look at what I said above and run a bot to fix the use of {{Forumheader2}} in forum posts. Even if I don't make any changes, that is still wrong. -- Fandyllic (talk · contr) 27 Jul 2011 2:09 PM Pacific

Just to be totally clear, this forum post and others in the Admin Forum have the following wikitext at the top of each page: {{Forumheader2|Admin Forum}}

From what I can tell by looking at {{Forumheader2}}, the |Admin Forum part is unnecessary and should probably be removed before the forum gets too many posts.-- Fandyllic (talk · contr) 27 Jul 2011 2:12 PM Pacific

Thing is, most of the people who come to Community Central seeking assistance, are Administrators on their home wikis. Consequently, there’s always going to be overlap between the two forum areas. Frankly, it just means extra work for us having to come here and then go there for what is essentially the same thing. I think Fandyllic is just trying to provide a second-best solution for this predictable, foreseeable problem. (First best being to just go back to one centralized forum.) Also, I am surprised we are not seeing more duplicate postings, where fairly new admins post their queries both here and over at Support Requests. Thanks! — SpikeToronto 21:34, July 27, 2011 (UTC)

Double-check me on this, but I believe Forumheader2 was used so that the code here could be managed separately from the main community central forum headers. We rearranged the categories over there last week, and needed to do some fancy footwork with the headers at that time because the existing content complicated things. Please check with Charitwo and/or Sovq before changing headers here to make sure there aren't other considerations. Also, as Meighan mentioned, we need to reorganize here anyway. Must add categories to this forum before we can import Logo Creation Wiki. --Dopp (help forum | blog) 23:02, July 27, 2011 (UTC)

p.s. oh, i misread -- you're not asking why we're using Forumheader2 instead of Forumheader. :) Thanks for bringing this up. We do also want help with the forum reorganization from a Forum-config-savvy user. Fandyllic, are you interested in taking this on, or should I pass it back to the other users we've been working with? If you're interested, lemme know and I'll explain the categories we want to build. --Dopp (help forum | blog) 23:08, July 27, 2011 (UTC)

SpikeToronto, We knew that there would be overlap in the beginning, it's one of the reasons we think organizing will better help that in the future. Something to keep in mind is that F/A is for founders & admins to come and meet, learn, share and teach each other. Not that that doesn't happen in Community -- but here its specific to founders and admins. It's a smaller community. We're still growing and working it all out. But I am confident like most online endeavors it will take on a life of it's own and become what it will. ;) --Meighan (help forum | blog) 00:18, July 28, 2011 (UTC)

I could be wrong, but from my experience at least half the questions that appear in the Support Request forum are founders and admins looking for help. Maybe Community needs a Community-corner notification to tell visiting founders and admins to go to their forum and not the regular Support Requests one. -- Fandyllic (talk · contr) 28 Jul 2011 5:44 PM Pacific

Updates

If wikia is going to pretend to care about admins now, can we finally get some centralized notice of CSS and patch updates? I don't like learning about some change on the back end by finding something broken on a wiki which wasn't broken before. I have to assume that if it isn't in what you generously called a blog update we aren't suppose to know or complain about it, but it's the admins that have to clean up after you most of time, so I would like to know beforehand when i need to get my bullshit mop out. It might also be nice if community input were a little more than the mysterious and wikia hand picked "community council", since it seems everything else falls on either def ears, or isn't open for discussion. - Archduk3 00:00, July 29, 2011 (UTC)