Ad blocker interference detected!
Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers
Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.
What is your username? Angelo Gabrini
Please link to the wiki here: http://kanojo-ga-flag-o-oraretara.wikia.com/wiki/Kanojo_ga_Flag_o_Oraretara_Wiki
How many edits have you made on that wiki? 18
How many days/months have you been editing there? I joined on June 7th, so around 6 months and 14 days
On the Special Pages → Special:ListUsers when was the last time an admin edited, and who was it? http://kanojo-ga-flag-o-oraretara.wikia.com/wiki/User:Eucliwood1 09:54, August 28, 2014 http://kanojo-ga-flag-o-oraretara.wikia.com/wiki/User:Monkey_D._Natsu 16:58, August 2, 2014
Any other information: No one really edits the wiki, and there's a lot of missing info as of the current date. I also have the original sources that I can contribute from. I have a lot of time that I can spend on the wiki. I am also an admin on two other wikis that are decently big, so I have experience with dealing with certain situations.
If anyone has any questions, feel free to ask me anything
Also, Eucliwood1 - a bureaucrat - recently logged in around 20 December 2014. Contacting them on their message wall about gaining admin rights may be faster than waiting for the adoption request to be processed. If you choose to contact them you may wish to read this helpful blog by Sannse. Good luck! -- 12:56, December 21, 2014 (UTC)
- LegendFPS - I can't change the rules if I'm just an admin, I would at least need to be a bureaucrat. I have several ideas that could make the wiki work better.
- I just want to add, just because it says "recently logged on" doesn't mean they actually looked at the wiki. It was the same across multiple wikis, which shows that wikia just updates the time
- That edit shouldn't count. The user didn't edit the wiki, it was their own user page. That's why I don't really like the 60 days part of the rules, since just one edit (even if it's not related like user pages) can mess you up.
- I'll probably try after I get the results of this claim.
- Unofficial response: (Please wait for an official response by a staff member)Hey Angelo. Unfortunately in this case, the most basic and prime rule about adopting a wiki is for none of the Admins to be active for 60 days. But since Eucliwood1 edited today, that makes this adoption request ineligible. You're gonna have to request the rights from them. Joey (talk)
- Still, the fact that the user was inactive is still true, and who knows if Eucliwood1 will edit again
- Hi. You are correct that a single edit to a user page does not make the user suddenly active (although it suggests strongly that you should contact him out of courtesy). However, given that you yourself have been inactive for nearly as long as the bureaucrat, and have only made two small edits like him, I am going to close this request. Please feel free to ask again when you are more active and have at least tried to contact Eucliwood1. -- Wendy (talk) 06:43, December 29, 2014 (UTC)