RfA Blurb

Support

Oppose

• Strong oppose, recommend speedy close: No worthwhile contributions on Central, no RfA blurb. --Skizzerz 00:26, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
• Oppose: Per Skizzerz. --Charitwo^Talk 00:28, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
• Oppose: same. --Uberfuzzy 00:35, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
• Oppose: ditto. — 03:47, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
• Strong oppose: He hasn't done anything of significance here. --Michaeldsuarez ^{(Talk) (Deeds)} 12:58, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
• Oppose: Per all these guys above. Dancing Penguin (Talk!) 19:18, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Now that the protection has expired, I would like to say that I did not submit this RfA and I was not aware that I had been nominated until yesterday. The person who nominated me (Galuminas) said that he did it "just for fun". GT5162 21:37, 22 March 2009 (UTC)