Date format Edit

This page should give or link to the date format for the expiry field in the protection interface. OrbFu 23:00, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

It's supposed to be GNU Standard format. See here. Timeroot Talk • Contribs • Edit count 00:01, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Just to let you know Edit

The info on this page is outdated, just thought I would let you know. --124.171.93.226 09:10, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

How so? Kirkburn (talk) 00:07, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

• The Cascading protection is not used anymore
  • It is, still. —I-20the highway 01:46, October 9, 2010 (UTC)
• Monobook should be changed to Monaco --Owen1983 15:21, October 8, 2010 (UTC)
  • Will do. —I-20the highway 01:46, October 9, 2010 (UTC)

There are three unneccesary === at the end of the page. Iggyvolz 15:20, June 18, 2012 (UTC)

And there is an edit link at the top of the page. --user452 01:28, June 19, 2012 (UTC)

Oops! I thought the page was protected! -- Iggyvolz 14:01, June 19, 2012 (UTC)

Semi-protection status change Edit

Under "Protection levels", the description for semi-protected needs to be updated to show that on wikis where it is required to have an account for compliance with COPPA and other laws, it doesn't have much effect. Once a person has had their account for more than four days and has made 10 edits, they are autoconfirmed and no longer restricted by the page protection. Chances are, a person going to a COPPA-compliant wiki is already going to be in autoconfirmed status.

To make semi-protection useful for these wikis, another level in between "semi-protected" and "fully protected" (admin-only) would have to be created, or else make the "semi-protected" level adjustable so that an admin can select the number of edits and days before a user goes into autoconfirmed status for that wiki. —RRabbit42 (leave a message) 14:47, May 21, 2014 (UTC)

You can submit feedback and suggestions at Special:Contact/feedback. Personally, I don't see such a customizable protection necessary. --Tupka²¹⁷ 14:59, May 21, 2014 (UTC)

I realize that it's there just to keep the easy targets away from people who want to cause trouble. I'm just noting that because of the change to comply with COPPA, it makes semi-protecting pages on those wikis pretty much pointless. —RRabbit42 (leave a message) 00:16, May 22, 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, seems like something we'd want to cover here. Good catch -- RansomTime 16:29, June 4, 2014 (UTC)