I'm not sure if you've heard about the news on Gorillaz Wiki. But here's a rundown of the whole problem...
A user named Star jam167 had been banned from the wiki but had made an anonymous account and had posted a picture of lesbians on the message walls of two people (MisterXenomorph & Worldsokayest). They both reported it and an admin (Radical Edward2) had taken care of it.
Yesterday, I got an email from MisterXenomorph saying that he had been globally blocked from every wiki site. I reported it to Radical Edward and he said that he had a feeling that Star jam had something to do with it.
This morning another user (Karate kid19) and I had gotten a picture of lesbians from Star jam. We reported it & he was blocked. Then Karate kid19 was blocked apparently due to Star jam using her ip address. Radical Edward unblocked her but now two administrators (Aguziel & HighJewElfKing) from the South Park Wiki were getting suspicious whether Karate kid19 is sockpuppeting as Star jam. Aguziel had messaged Radical Edward to let him know of the possible sockpuppeting. If you ask me about karate kid19, I think she seems alright...but you never know...
I have a few links if you need any evidence. (i tried to upload a picture but I'm having trouble uploading it)
Ok i suggest that you make a wiki about the Disney family and their relitives. This would not only give you one topic to talk about but a whole lot. Another suggestion i have is you make a wiki and have a topic about the Disney family and then you can also have room for anything else Disney like movie theorys and so on. I also think that might attract more readers. Anyway those are just some ideas. Its entirely up to you what you do. I hope this helps and make sure you tell me how it goes. And also if you have time maybe check out my wiki at www.our-fanfictions.wikia.com or c:our-fanfictions
Hi, a certain person on the wiki I'm on has been getting to many insults on his message wall. Because of this his getting emails, he already has Too many insults from what I can tell, I'm asking. Can you disable his message wall, that only the admins of the wiki can put a message on his wall. Including this. Nobody but him and admins can reply to the message. If you can do this I'm sure he will be grateful. (If I have to, should I put a link to his message wall?)
I'm sorry, it's not possible to protect a message wall like that. The best thing for them to do is write to staff using the contact form giving links to the message wall and to specific harassing posts. Then we can look at the situation.
Callofduty4 recently banned me from chat. He claimed that he banned me for harassment, but I was definitely not harassing anyone.
In chat, I was telling people about how a friend of mine told me that C.Syde65 was spreading misinformation about me. I was asking around for evidence and found at least one witness (Harleyquin). However, I was then kicked from chat by Callofduty4.
I asked why I was kicked and got no answer, so I continued discussing the matter with other users. One particular user claimed that I was definitely wrong, even though they admitted that they were not there and that they could not dispute the fact that there were witnesses.
After a long time, Callofduty4 decided to answer my question. He told me to drop the subject. I was indignant, but I accepted it and planned to tell him about the situation and ask him to check the logs. However, before I could ask him to PM, I was banned. For fourteen days.
Could you investigate this situation and unban me if you find that I am not guilty? In addition, could you check the ban logs for August 15 and look at what C.Syde was saying about me on that day?
I feel that there have been two serious miscarriages of justice- the first being my ban for no reason and the second being C.Syde's badmouthing being tolerated and denied.
Since when have I actually badmouthed in chat, and since when have I actually spread misinformation about you? If I ever spoke of you in chat, and I don't recall speaking of you very often, I only spoke of how irritating I found you, and asking how I was supposed to deal with your annoying habits. That's all I ever said. There is nothing wrong with that.
You were wrong mate, I was there on that day, and there was no witnesses only one user vaguely claiming that she saw Syde badmouth. I don't know what your game is, but I feel that you are trying to annoy Syde.
Darytyg, you previously admitted that you were not on Community Central on that day. Please do not lie so that you can blindly defend others. If you did not see C.Syde65 badmouth me, then maybe you were not there. Please do not bandwagon and interfere with situations that you do not know anything about.
C.Syde65, if you're going to deny badmouthing me and making all the users on Community Central attack me, it doesn't matter. We will be able to prove this using the chat logs.
In addition, MisterXenomorph, you do not know anything about the situation. I do not recall seeing you at any time and I doubt that you were there when C.Syde65 was badmouthing me. You are also globally blocked, so I'm not getting the impression that you're a reliable source.
You cannot accuse me of badmouthing, since I never did badmouth. Don't accuse someone of badmouthing unless it's been proven. Innocent until proven guilty. Assume good faith in the mean time. And in any case, it's in the past, not the present. Let it go.
Innocent until proven guilty is a very good principle. However, I have already received evidence from at least two sources that you were, in fact, spreading lies about me and trying to get users to hate me. That seems like enough evidence for me to say that you guilty.
But I am not saying that you are guilty; I am merely proposing that a chat mod check the chat logs to see whether you are guilty. In the meantime, however, it would be nice if users that have no idea about the situation (Darytyg, MisterXenomorph) could avoid participating in this discussion and saying with such blind conviction that C.Syde65 is right and I am wrong.
Neither of those two sources count for much. And one of those sources you mentioned never actually said that they admitted that I was spreading lies about you - which I was not - and I wasn't trying to get users to hate you. I seriously doubt that the chat moderators will check the logs just for you.
Darytyg actually does know about the situation. He was there on the 18th when you got banned, which contradicts the fact that I ever told lies about you on the 15th. Before you got banned on the 18th, none of the users that were in chat at the time believed that I was in the wrong. I even have snapshots on my PC to prove it.
Darytyg is not blind. What he saw on the 18th was a prime example of your failure to abide by what other users in chat have asked of you. And you didn't follow what they asked of you. Therefore the ban that was placed on you was correct, and consensus among users and chat moderators alike has not changed.
Also if the chat moderators are refusing to lift the ban they placed on you, there's no reason why I should stop being distrusting of you.
In your first paragraph, you claim that the sources I used to prove that you were badmouthing me are invalid. Harleyquin, however, was a reliable witness. I asked her in PM about the things C.Syde65 was saying, and she said that Syde was getting people to hate me and telling lies about the situation on the Sims Wiki. That proves my case. The other source was a user on another wiki that I visit, who gave me a few quotes about what happened on the day. These sources are reliable.
In your second paragraph, you claim that Darytyg's presence on the 18th means that Darytyg knew about the situation on the 15th. This is the most illogical statement I have ever read. Darytyg being there on the 18th means that he is primary evidence for the 15th? Please read that again and reconsider.
I never said that Darytyg was blind; I said that he had blind conviction. He knows nothing about your spreading of misinformation. How do I know that? Because he wasn't there. I remember him saying that he knows that you did not spread misinformation because he trusts you. That is called jumping into a situation you know nothing about. It's like jumping into a courtroom and saying "oh this guy didn't commit murder. i know that because i don't think he would" and expecting the judge to declare the accused innocent and send everyone home.
In your third paragraph, you also say that my ban was correct because I didn't listen to the users in the chat. That is not harassment. That is not even bannable. The only users who told me to drop the subject were you and Darytyg. I assumed that you were only saying that because you were afraid of being proven wrong, so I continued. I did, however, drop the subject when Callofduty4 told me to drop the subject, as I figured that he was an unbiased third party. However, before I could tell Callofduty to go to PM so I could get to the bottom of this, I was banned for no reason.
In your fourth paragraph, you say nothing of value. All you say is that, if chat moderators are unwilling to lift the ban, I shouldn't be trusted. First of all, the only reason Jr Mime was unwilling to lift the ban was because he didn't want to undo another mod's ban- he didn't want to get into a situation that he knows nothing about (a principle, by the way, that Darytyg and MisterXenomorph should consider abiding by). Next, you're saying that whatever the chat mods think is right. There is something in our world called "formulating one's own opinion". I don't know if you've heard of it, but basically, it means that you should think for yourself and not just blindly listen to other people. Jr Mime and Callofduty4 being unwilling to ban me is not justification that I should not be unbanned and that I should not be trusted.
I have rebutted your argument. The users who are jumping into this thread and saying that I am wrong without any knowledge should not be doing so. My ban was unfair. There is enough evidence to result in an investigation of the situation on the 15th.
Once again. You cannot accuse me of badmouthing, since I never did badmouth. Don't accuse someone of badmouthing unless it's been proven. Innocent until proven guilty. Assume good faith in the mean time. And in any case, it's in the past, not the present. Let it go.
Lol did you even read my reply? Your repeated reply has little to do with what I just said.
Do you want me to rebut that same argument again? Alright.
"Innocent until proven guilty is a very good principle. However, I have already received evidence from at least two sources that you were, in fact, spreading lies about me and trying to get users to hate me. That seems like enough evidence for me to say that you guilty.
But I am not saying that you are guilty; I am merely proposing that a chat mod check the chat logs to see whether you are guilty. In the meantime, however, it would be nice if users that have no idea about the situation (Darytyg, MisterXenomorph) could avoid participating in this discussion and saying with such blind conviction that C.Syde65 is right and I am wrong."
I did read your reply, but I refuse to carry it out. It seems to me that you're refusing to put this behind you, and nothing anyone says or does is going to change your mind about this. We're basically going around in circles here, so I suggest you just let go of what has happened in the past, and wait patiently for your block to expire. I am getting really sick of this argument and I want it over and done with as soon as possible.
I know you don't want to continue this argument. That's because you're afraid of being wrong. This is exactly what happened when I tried to appeal for my block. You removed the thread because you didn't want to deal with a situation wherein you might be wrong. Please take responsibility for your actions.
The only reason we're going around in circles is because you refuse to have a proper discussion and just post random sentences as if you're a bot giving automated messages. I'm trying to prove my innocence, but all you're doing is repeating yourself.
Furthermore, I do not have to let go of what happened in the past because it was damaging to me; you besmirched my name and spread lies about me. I have no reason to wait patiently for my ban to expire, because it was unfair and injustice must be dealt with.
I removed the thread because it was harassment, and because you weren't supposed to appeal an unblock here at the Community Central. I did tell you to appeal for an unblock on the Sims wiki, and if you had requested an unblock there, I might have considered shortening or removing the block.
I'm not prepared to discuss this. This incident is over. There is nothing more to be said about the situation, because everything that could have been said has been said already. I'm putting the past behind me, and I'm letting it go. I suggest you do the same.
First of all, it wasn't harassment. I was just appealing for a block. You happened to take it as harassment because you felt threatened and didn't want your reputation as an administrator tarnished. I told you that it was impossible for me to request an unblock on the Sims Wiki because I was blocked, but you didn't consider this.
I know you're not prepared to discuss this. Again, you don't want to be proven wrong. You keep on saying that you're putting this behind you, as if that makes you a great person. However, for you, it is very easy to put the incident behind you, because if we actually discuss the incident, you will be affected.
It's easy for you to put the past behind you because it is incriminating for you. But the past was cruel to me. I have to fix the problem. It is difficult for me to put the past behind me because it caused me much pain and it must be dealt with.
The incident is also not over; I am still banned from chat because I wanted to fix a problem. I am still experiencing the result of this situation.
Oh, sorry. I didn't realise that I could have accessed my talk page. Regardless, that was not an important part of my argument. I was just using that as an example. You ignored the rest of my reply because you didn't have a response.
I already spoke to Harleyquin16 in main chat and in private message and she said that you were badmouthing me and spreading lies about the situation by linking it and lying about it. We can confirm this by checking the chat logs. However, I'm not sure if we can confirm what you say she said in private message.
I also have another witness on one of the wikis I frequent, who has direct quotes from the situation and can testify that you were spreading misinformation.
Don't go round pinning this on other users. This is your ban. This isn't anyone else's. If you really wanted to avoid getting banned, then you should have listened to what Callofduty4 told you. If you don't think your ban was fair then you should explain why - but not blaming anyone else. Like I said, this is your ban, and your ban is about you. It's not about others.
If Callofduty4 had told me that I was on my last straw, I would immediately have taken the issue to Private Message. But you continued to discuss the issue in Main Chat, which is why you got banned.
We've already gotten to the bottom of the situation. It's not mine, nor anyone else's fault that you were too ignorant to accept that and move on. If you really wanted to avoid getting banned, you would have taken the issue over to Private Message.
I've seen this before, users ignoring the warnings that the Chat Moderators have given them, and then complained because they didn't think their ban was fair. You are no different to any of the other users that have been in this situation.
You were harassing me in chat. I told you, as did others, to stop carrying on with an issue that was already in the past. But you didn't stop harassing us, which is why you got banned.
I already explained that, right after Callofduty4 warned me, I decided to take it to private message. By then, I was already banned.
Your second paragraph just repeats the same flawed argument.
Your third paragraph, again, repeats the same flawed argument. I did not ignore the warning, as I was about to take the issue to private message, but was banned before I could do so.
I'm not sure if this last paragraph is meant to be a rebuttal to me saying that I was harassing you, but you're basically just saying "You were harassing me" to prove that I was harassing you. Do I need to repeat that I was not harassing you? Do I need to repeat that I was just talking about the issue to other people?
I have photos of the incident on my PC, so I can check whether what you're saying is true or not.
Callofduty4 ― I just asked you to drop the subject
Themasterofdenial ― I think we need to get to the bottom of this
The masterofdenial ― alright
The masterofdenial ― first
~ Themasterofdenial has been banned by Callofduty4 ~
Does that ring a bell? Or do you I have to upload an image of the incident? I don't really want to have to because I'm not sure whether that would be abiding by the rules of Wikia.
I actually find what happened in chat to be very fair. You had been warned at least twice (counting the one in the example I have just posted in the example above). And you had already been kicked beforehand.
Yes, but you've already been repeatedly warned by administrators and chat moderators not to engage in discussions related to this topic, as it is considered harassment. I can hardly call that innocent.
Ok I am sorry for doing this but really can we not just move on from the incident itself and be mature here? This argument is leading nowhere and poor Sannse's message wall and inbox is probably getting flooded due to the argument taking place.
You were banned from The Sims wiki Denial, that won't change, the ban will always be there in the past, you can't change that you have been banned. But you can make the future better by progressing and leaving the ban in the past where it belongs.
I am tired of this argument, I am pretty sure all the mods are tired of it and Syde is tired of it too, all this is doing is displaying that you cannot accept a stupid ban that occured 5 days ago, and I am sure you don't want it to appear that way do you?
Honestly I understand if a ban hurts you, when I received my first ban I was hurt too, but I moved on and used that as strength. You must take this ban and move from it and learn from it and stop staying stuck in the past upon this.
Plus at the end of the day what will you achieve? Syde's demotion? Humilation of him? Is that what you truley want? I am appealing to your hummanity in this and asking you to please leave this in the past and move on from this.
He's talking about the ban that occurred 3 days ago on the Community Central, not the block that occurred 5 days ago on the Sims wiki. But I agree with what Darytyg has said.
When I was banned from the Community Central Chat, I thought it was unfair. I might have been right that my ban was unfair. I might have been wrong. But the fact is that I stood back and let it happen.
And then when I returned, I was a sadder and wiser user, and took care never to allow users on the Community Central Chat to push my buttons to the point where I told those users that were annoying me to shut up.
I'm not going to rebut Darytyg's argument because he's talking about the wrong thing (another example of him inserting himself into arguments he doesn't know anything about).
C.Syde65, the difference is that your ban was fair because it was based on something that you did do, while mine was based on conjecture. You called me an idiot and started raging because you didn't understand my sarcasm, while I was banned in the middle of asking Callofduty4 to PM.
The general consensus on Wikis seems to be that if you experience injustice, you should just learn from it and move on. However, this should not be the case. If you experience injustice, you should try and fix it. I'm not going to explain why my ban was unfair again because I've already done it many times.
Again, you continued to ask users whether they could remember me badmouthing about you, which didn't happen. None of the users in chat claimed that such a thing took place. Pestering users to rack their brains as to whether they could remember such an incident taking place is blatant harassment. You kept going on and on about it, and then you got kicked. You continued to go on about it, and then you got banned. If I was doing that, not that I have, then a ban is what I would expect. I'm going to depart from this discussion, because it's clear that you cannot accept that you are in the wrong. Don't bother to respond to my message because I've removed it from my followed pages, and thus I will not receive a notification of your response.
Do you think I'm participating in this thread to elicit a response from you or to make sure you see it? I'm here to prove my innocence.
I did not pester users to rack their brains; I simply asked one user and they said yes immediately.I was on your ignorelist, so you couldn't see the situation.That's not harassment; that's asking a question. I was just talking about how one of my associates had told me that you were spreading misinformation about me. That's not harassment; that's talking to other users and discussing an issue.
I remember, after my kick, I asked why I was kicked and got no answer. I was not made aware of why I was kicked. Because of this, I continued to talk about the issue. After I continued to talk about the issue, Callofduty4 told me to drop the subject. That was when I decided to drop the subject and to take the conversation to PM. That was when I was banned.
Ok as it's clear that this argument is going nowhere I am going to butt out of this and unfollow this, so let me make myself clear you won't see another response from me as I am unfollowing this page so please don't reply.
I am going to be as polite as I possibly can but given your pride I know you will not take notice of this message and I don't care as I have wasted enough energy and time into this argument and I like Syde am done with this.
Let me make my previous message more clear I was suggesting you move on from this and maturely learn form it. I was not continuing a debate nor was I adding to it so don't come with," I am going into arguments I have no knowledge of mess," as it is completely false.
I am not blind nor am I devoted to Syde in any way whatsoever I like him am tired of this argument and I like him see where things are stupid and pointless in progression and want to move on from this discussion.
Unfair? Let me tell you what's unfair mate, Syde having to deal with you to such a extent that he had a nervous anxiety attack for a constant five days and him having a panick attack on chat. He has enough to deal with in life without you causing more damage.
What's more unfair you may ask? Me watching my friend break down over a silly user and you constantly making me more and more annoyed dispite how many times I tried to convience him to move on from this.
The mods having to deal with your back chatting, spam and ignoration of there moderation rules which resulted in your ban, not beacuse it was unfair whatsoever, but beacuse you broke the rules which leads you into a ban
Sannse having to see the constant flood of messages from this silly argument that you started and probably getting annoyed to such a extent that you might get banned again for leaving messages on message walls.
Buddy you don't know a thing about injustice and I think everyone on Community Central wiki can agree that this argument has been dragged on for long enough and it's time to end it once and for all.
You will always have that ban there. You will always have it in the past. You cannot change the past and you won't gain anything from this pointless argument. In the end what are you trying to prove, Syde is a bad user, the mods are bad at there job, how is that helpful in anyway.
So please stop this petty argument and move on from it. Children continue arguments that are old adults move on from them are you a child or a adult. I am appealing to your maturity in this and asking you nicely to move on and mature bro.
There is a wiki very similar to the 39 clues wiki, with 751 pages on the wiki, but only 3 different people, CahillFamilyHead975 (61 edits), and Lord Cahill (34 edits). Obviously the edit to page ratio doesn't add up, and nearly all of the pages on this wiki are almost exactly like the one on the 39 clues wiki! Is this plagiarism, or a glitch?! Also, I came to you since I couldn't find anything here on plagiarism.
They are the same! Minus some unexisting links and photos, they are copies! The wiki activity there only shows edits being made on 3 or so pages that are not copies, along with some threads. CFH didn't seem to know the pages, due to this thread: 
Hey LV11, just saying i did not block him since i am waiting for his bureaucrat rights to be removed, since if i block him, he will unblcok himself, and if i remove admin rights he will make himself an admin since he is a bureaucrat
I am a little miffed a feature I've used for years to build the Tokusatsu wikis is suddenly gone and replaced with a very generic easy edit builder.
I can't customize a new template infobox on Kamen Rider Wiki I've been designing for a Comic book (granted it is a one off as the comic is the only one of its kind, but I was going to make a variant for the many manga pages on Kamen Rider Wiki).
Is source mode still there somewhere for templates or is it gone for good?