Hi. I was wondering if you and the other editors on the Disney Wiki are planning to have bios made out for the characters that are exclusive to Mickey and the Roadster Racers like Billy Beagle and Susie Beagleman.
Hello! I saw you making many edits on your message, so I would like to let you know that it would be good to not make so many edits, especially such small ones, in short period here. :) That gets rather spammy on Recent Changes, and hardens our moderation a bit. ^^
Ah, no, I did not mean that you are a spammer or such, of course. Sorry if it came across as such. I understand that. :) Editing your message some times is fine, indeed. I am just saying that it would be appreciated if you could try to lessen your edits a bit. Like twenty edits or such within an hour on same message gets a bit excessive, you see. ^^
It's horrible that you allow know-nothing morons like Weedle McHairybug to run amok on sites like the Disney Wiki.
Also, The Walt Disney Company should not be using the Disney Wiki for information, due to how you, SilverFlight, Hey1234 and all the other dictator-like badly-behaved spoiled child admins allow innacurrate info to remain on the wiki and your nasty habits of allowing the continued perpetuation of lies such as the Beast's name being Adam, the Queen from Sleeping Beauty being named Leah, the direct to video sequels being canon, Clarabelle being Goofy's official girlfriend, etc. when all of you brats should know darn well that all of those things are FALSE!
Plus your refusals to listen to reason and making it so hard to talk to you guys.
And don't even think about trying to block me or anything like that. Your whining will only fall on deaf ears and you doing such things will only further prove that you and the other Disney Wiki admins are officially bratty, immature, refuse to take criticism, refuse to listen to reason, don't know what REAL facts are, enjoy disrespecting the Disney company and what they've made official, etc. Drop your my-way-or-the-highway attitudes and start respecting what has truly been declared official by the company (certain characters not having official names, direct to video sequels being non-canonical, certain character relationships, etc.) and stop making things like even harder for the company!
I know that I'm not Alex2424121 (sorry for interrupting on your wall, Alex), but can you please stop this, Duke Remington? This isn't the first time I have seen you complain about the way that the Disney wiki is run and also make false claims about them blocking you for no good reason.
I've been to the Disney wiki many times and it looks fantastic. It has high quality and accurate content (all inaccurate information seems to get reverted pretty quickly). Please just let it go and move on from the Disney wiki.
That is alright Veenster7, I appreciate your support. As for you Duke Remington, you were told to move on. You misbeheaved, caused a lot of arguments and war-edits and refused to cooperate whenever you were messaged not to do something. Making false claims about us blocking you is not going to change anything, it's just going to make you look like a bad person. The only one who is being childish here is you.
Never coward is finished, this one that believes the truth to me or if I do not tell him administrator and he will leave innocent and it is to ERASE THE MESSAGES IS OF COWARD, DOES NOT COMPLETE UNTIL YOU BELIEVE ME
Drop the attitude. If you were honest from the beginning we wouldn't be having this. I still stand by my claims, and up till now I don't know who or what to believe anymore. Now I don't care if you are a sock puppet or not. You're presence has given me nothing but frustration in my effort to keep editing and image uploading under control.
Also do something about your speech pattern, you can't even write a clean message. I say it's over because I have had enough. I don't want to see or hear from you again, and I don't want to hear anymore of these accounts either. No Mandalorean Leader, no Sith Comando and no Galactic Bounty Hunter.
I probably should have mentioned this earlier, but there is a way of proving where you were on the account of when this user was present. If you have taken photos of your visit to the celebration then you are able to prove it to Me.
However, there still remains a thousand questions that I have no answers, which leads back to the suspecting accounts that I accuse you of. I can easily get those answers if only I had the assistance required, but since I haven't got it I am forced to follow my instincts and believe Me I do not enjoyed it. You may think I am coldly enjoying accusing you, but deep down I'm not.
Hello. I see that you blocked me for 3 days on Disney Wiki. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I guess the reason for that is that I categorized some pages in a new category called "1990s American television series"? If that's it, I apologize. If it's something else, please let me know. Could you please unblock me, if that's OK?
Most of the decade categories for television shows say "American" in their headings. If your intentions were replacing the ".... American television series" categories with just ".... television series" then you may carry on.
Ok, thanks for unblocking me. Do you think it would be a good idea to remove the "American" from all these categories like "1950s American television series", "1960s American television series", etc.? (there are at least a few Canadian shows and I created "Disney CRUJ" as probably the first page for a Brazilian show) I was doing the other way around and adding "American" to the 1990s category, but I'm okay with doing whatever makes the most sense to the community.
Replacing the categories with "1950s television series", "1960s television series" means it applies to all in those decade, never mind if its from America, France or whatever. Besides mostly all the shows originate from America.
Alex! I didn't want anyone to use the template yet, I'm still trying to work out the code. I understand if you want to use it, but if you please consider that I don't like rushing and other people using it before it's even ready otherwise there might be some kinks. So please, leave it alone until it's done. I'm sorry if I'm sounding forceful, but I've been working really heard on this and the last thing I want is premature usage.
I wasn't going to use it, I was just testing it out myself in one of my sanboxes, and only made a few small changes to just the border. I have no intention of using it until you say it is ready. So far I'm impressed with what you've done, and I agree you still need a few tweaks to make. If I may point out an example, all the list of links won't show while this "|" is present so that needs some looking into. Plus the need to adjust the font size. I'm not trying to be bossy, impatient or whatever, I'm just pointing out a few hiccups which I'm sure you have already noticed and will eventually fix.
I'm not going to touch yours. If you're referring to that edit I just made today that was an accident. I thought I was on my own, and I didn't check the heading. There is no need to get all moody, okay? I did undo my mistake and put it where I wanted it.
I am proud to announce that the navbox is finally ready: . Bear in mind this one has round edges because it gives it a softer look compared to sharp edges. Sorry if I was so hard on you before. Also, I recommend using this symbol "•" instead of "|", otherwise the stuff won't show.
Apology accepted and I was going to say. SilverFlight, I'm no longer so sure about using this to replace the code. It's only designed for one layout, because we have a couple of naboxes that have a very different layout. Different logo size and there is also the "|" issue. With the original code there is more control over how the navbox should look.
I'm sorry but I'm afraid you'll have to scrap this idea of yours and make do with what we have. I get you wanted to simplify the usage but sometimes there are not easy ways and sometimes the hard ways remain the best ways. Too bad about the wasted effort.
Who said it was extra work? If anything, putting in all that extra code is work, adding a template means you don't have to add in so many numbers. What else would be wrong? There's no visible problem with it and can still be used. How would everyone else feel about it?
Which you could easily just do by editing the source code in the original navbox? Why don't you ask the other admins what they think before deciding it doesn't work? I'm going to be really busy today, and this was something I worked really hard on prior to all the real-life work I'm going to do.
I got the "V-E-D" code working properly, so I guess we can use it. I apologize for being so suddenly negative when I agreed with it. You know how I am with drawbacks and things like that. I'll also provide us with some assistance in apply it to all the navboxes.