Yes, it is pl.wow.wikia.com . Old admins destroyed it, then they gone to wow gamepedia, and in 2015 both sites were dead. So in december 2017 we started to make it live again, but this 3-4 year break meant that the site lacks a lot of articles. And sorry for my english, i am still learing and 1-2 words were translated on the internet, so my statement may look weird.
Hello Fandyllic, as you suggested, I will leave a message here regarding my request to cleanup and correct my infobox template located at the link. For reference, the image shows how it should look when working correctly.
Excellent, I can't thank you enough for your help, its invaluable mate. I will get to that first thing in the morning. Do you think it will correct my infobox render to look more like the design shown in the image in my first message once I have placed your code? Or is that a <group> tag issue?
Fandyllic, it has been implemented into the template by myself and another user, DarthKitty, from the FANDOM Open Source Library, and besides streamlining the code (which was amazing work, thank you) it still does not solve the problem of the infobox layout I was originally having, now it just looks like this:
I kind of agree with you in regards to Monobook. Never been a total fan, yet will kind of miss it. It had its uses and was kind of neat, but honestly though, it was missing stuff that Wikia offered (that I liked).
But anyways, I am not gonna dump a list of complaints on your wall, other than it was someone reactionary to keep yet the wiki-like viewpoint is nostalgic-stirring.
I guess some people dont like change as much as I envision.
People don't seem to get that if Wikia supported Monobook, meaning put in ads and access to a bunch of other stuff Oasis skin has, it would lose much of the attraction it has right now. Wikia is probably mostly using GDPR as an excuse, but they could have handled it much better.
Hey Fandyllic. I have recently been trying to pickup JS. I have tried a few small things here. I would appreciate your opinion when you have the chance. Is there a more efficient way? Are there any conventions I am not following? Those are the types of questions I have.
I'm by no means a JS expert, but the code looks straightforward, so if it works you're probably fine.
After looking at your code, my only advice is to read up on JQuery which is JS library built-in to most major websites including Fandom wikis. If you look at my code, I use it heavily. It has tons of shortcuts for quicker manipulation of CSS and HTML DOM elements.
Okay. Thanks for the feedback. Is there anyone else you would recommend me asking for feedback? I am already aware of JQuery. As you said, it is very common. So much so that it is hard to find anything that works with just "plain" JS. However, I had gotten the impression is was mostly useful for selecting multiple elements at a time; something which doesn't really apply in my case. Although, I did use it so the function isn't called until the pages is fully loaded; at least, I think that is what I did.