Paul.rea wrote: I'm assuming you want me to delete the uploaded image and not the blog you posted with links to your DeviantArt Site.
Uhm yeah exactly, actually i just wanted to put it first as kinda Tumbnail but it didn't work out as i imagined so i just putted the LINKS and not the Photo itself THX and Sorry
Why did you block me? I don't get. Yes I undid your restore edit and that was because when you undid my edit , you also undid the spelling and the grammar corrections me and other users did. I even correct the biography of Jackson to it's original edit. So that brings be back to the question of why you blocked ME? You could have given me a warning, you know like they do on other wikis.
If you had been a noob I would have probably given you a warning. You are not. I went to some trouble to undo all the damage you had done to the page.
This paragraph alone is so full of factual errors as to justify a block
"Jackson warns Lydia that she doesn't invite him to her birthday party. At the party, Jackson hallucinates that his biological parents were looking for him but when they turned to face him they were faceless, which results in him also turning faceless. Later at the party, he saves Matt from drowning in the pool. (read more...)
"Jackson warns Lydia that she doesn't invite"? What the F?
When an administrator has to go to the trouble to restore a page due to the damage you've caused to it - You should probably pay attention and not make the same mistake again.
Paul Rea 22:10, August 12, 2012 (UTC)
If you had given a warning I wouldn't have done it again. It kinda weird to block a user for simple mistakes like that. It's not like I go around spamming or vandalising the pages.
I am very upset about my blocking from one of my favorite shows wiki. It's not wise and compassionate just to block someone without telling them what they are doing wrong. On other wiki's users give other users a warning before they are blocked, here I wasn't given anything I was just blocked. Even though my edits were wrong in you view, I had GOOD INTENTIONS. So next time if I or any other user are making a mistake, can you please think twice before blocking us and give us a warning on our talk page? Thank You.
I couldn't find any other way to contact you since I was blocked.
You edited. I rolled back. You noted that I had rolled back in the comments section so I know you knew that an administrator had undone your edits.You were aware that those edits were unacceptable and yet you then chose to make those same edits again. So I blocked you.
I noticed that my edits were being rolled back after the second time I edited and it was reversed again. I didn't know what happened the first time, even so you couldn't warn me on my talk page? Most adminstrators do that as a warning to give the user a chance to stop what they were doing. Also you said that some pictures that are uploaded not all users can see, so why don't you reverse my Erica pic as well? I'm the one that put her current picture on her page a while back.
You're not paying attention. I said that the slide show that you installed doesn't work for all users. I siad the Allison image that you added was too dark to be a profile picture. If you don't check to see why someone reverted your edit - available in the page history and elsewhere - then that's your fault.
People don't just go round using a "rollback" on edits - there is always an excellent reason. Your responsibility would be to find out why to avoid getting yourself into a situation such as this. Instead, you pouted in the comment section and then redid something that an adminsitrator had taken the time and trouble to undo.
Fine, I still think a warning would've been nice. So if I can find a good pic of Allison that isn't too dark then can I add it unto her profile page? After my blocking is expired of course.
