All I said was "Hi. What's up?" on a user's message wall. Then, for some reason, they left a complaint about it on another user's message wall. Shortly after they complained, I was banned for 2 weeks. I'm not trying to sound rude, but I do believe that ban was unfair and should be removed immediately. Ik for a fact that is why I was banned, because it was the last thing I posted and the ban came shortly after I posted "Hi. What's up?". I was just trying to be polite when I said that.
Ik that now, but what I'm saying is I re-entered the chat b/c I wanted to apologize. I shouldn't have done what I did. I truly am sorry. I really like chatting with the users on there and maybe u can just lower the ban time from chat to like 1 year instead of infinite?
Not sure what I did to be blocked. I am a male btw and you already knew that. I don't like to argue for arguements sake. I didn't violate anything you told us not to talk about, so I just don't know why you blocked me. I didn't make light of the subject nor suggest it wasn't a big deal. I wasn't being an apologist either. For me to do so I would have had to defend those that would say it wasn't a big deal. I didn't do that. Also you keep insisting that the two actors are private individuals and cite their internet "stamps" as proof of this. As I pointed out though, someone's internet usage, social media talks, etc. are NOT any proof that in life they are or are not private individuals. As one person stated, there is absolutely no way someone can say that for a FACT without personally knowing them. I also said that I would accept your opinioin on that matter.
You said my ban was for discussion of a banned topic, but the topic was your topic and my discussion was simply quering you as to what degree people could discuss it and maintain your rule. The very first post had a guy talking about the content of the vid and nothing was done but I'm blocked for asking a question and stating an opinion? I also NEVER justified the crime. You didn't really read the post to come to that conclusion. I said over and over that it was a horrible thing to have happened. I would apologize IF I knew what I did wrong but I don't see where I did anything outside of your rules. I would appreciate if you would at least an answer as to why I was blocked.
One other thing that I wanted to ask: I haven't been going around and verbally assaulting you so why the character attack? Do you really get some kind of pleasure from verbally assaulting someone to others? I always figured you were older and more mature than to resort to such childish behavior. Yes, we all do that to some degree here and there but I really don't understand why you seem to have such a problem with me in particular. Our past debates aside, when have I argued with you or anyone else just for arguments sake? Have I offended you in some manner?
Lastly, my edit was only made because I kept getting asked where Allison moved from, I got the answer from the first episode and thought that those four little lines stating she moved from San Francisco to Beacon Hills made sense to include. I noticed that you reedited it. Was it that horrendous of an edit? Or is this just "getting back" at me for my opinion earlier?
Why did you block me? I don't get. Yes I undid your restore edit and that was because when you undid my edit , you also undid the spelling and the grammar corrections me and other users did. I even correct the biography of Jackson to it's original edit. So that brings be back to the question of why you blocked ME? You could have given me a warning, you know like they do on other wikis.
If you had been a noob I would have probably given you a warning. You are not. I went to some trouble to undo all the damage you had done to the page.
This paragraph alone is so full of factual errors as to justify a block
"Jackson warns Lydia that she doesn't invite him to her birthday party. At the party, Jackson hallucinates that his biological parents were looking for him but when they turned to face him they were faceless, which results in him also turning faceless. Later at the party, he saves Matt from drowning in the pool. (read more...)
"Jackson warns Lydia that she doesn't invite"? What the F?
When an administrator has to go to the trouble to restore a page due to the damage you've caused to it - You should probably pay attention and not make the same mistake again.
Paul Rea 22:10, August 12, 2012 (UTC)
I am very upset about my blocking from one of my favorite shows wiki. It's not wise and compassionate just to block someone without telling them what they are doing wrong. On other wiki's users give other users a warning before they are blocked, here I wasn't given anything I was just blocked. Even though my edits were wrong in you view, I had GOOD INTENTIONS. So next time if I or any other user are making a mistake, can you please think twice before blocking us and give us a warning on our talk page? Thank You.
I couldn't find any other way to contact you since I was blocked.
You edited. I rolled back. You noted that I had rolled back in the comments section so I know you knew that an administrator had undone your edits.You were aware that those edits were unacceptable and yet you then chose to make those same edits again. So I blocked you.
I noticed that my edits were being rolled back after the second time I edited and it was reversed again. I didn't know what happened the first time, even so you couldn't warn me on my talk page? Most adminstrators do that as a warning to give the user a chance to stop what they were doing. Also you said that some pictures that are uploaded not all users can see, so why don't you reverse my Erica pic as well? I'm the one that put her current picture on her page a while back.
You're not paying attention. I said that the slide show that you installed doesn't work for all users. I siad the Allison image that you added was too dark to be a profile picture. If you don't check to see why someone reverted your edit - available in the page history and elsewhere - then that's your fault.
People don't just go round using a "rollback" on edits - there is always an excellent reason. Your responsibility would be to find out why to avoid getting yourself into a situation such as this. Instead, you pouted in the comment section and then redid something that an adminsitrator had taken the time and trouble to undo.