So Basically It's useless and i'm so suppose to just Deal with it and hold my tongue and let people tell me what i have to say doesn't matter that's what's been going on everybody can say their Peace and people can call me names but the moment i speak up and say something I get banned and nobody Else downs
I've told Mods about it and nothing get's done about it
I have been blocked from the DC database wiki for inserting nonsense/gibberish into pages. If the block is permanent can you please tell me but if it is not how long does it last for. The nonsense and gibberish wont happen again.
Depends why you disabled your account, and what you use the new account for.
It's sockpuppetry if it's malicious use - vandalism, ban evasion, threatening. There are some legit uses for an alternate account, such as a split fanlife (being FluttershyLover on MLP and Darth Whatever on Wookieepedia, for example). As long as you weren't blocked under your old account, and are honest about your past "life", most admins would probably not block you.
I'm no staff; this is of no use to me. If you have any links to where he admits he's 10, send it to Special:Contact/general. This has to be a link (either to a page, a page history or deleted page); screenshots and chatlogs don't count.
I am 19, not 10. My user pages say that I am 19. And I never said I was 10. I will not say that I am 10, because I'm not, I'm 19 like I said.
You on the other hand have no business falsely accusing people of violating the wikia policies, especially since you yourself are violating the wikia policies by making sockpuppets and attacking other users.
You claim to be a good faith user, but your actions clearly prove to myself and other good faith users that you are the exact opposite. You claim to not be a sockpuppet, yet your IP address that you use to disrupt the wiki while logged out confirms otherwise.
So why is it not clearer in the rules that the administrators are not obligated to treat everyone the same. I've seen a lot of favoritism on many Wikis. Is the higher authority in this not doing anything, or are they just not aware?
"Keep feedback to the blog" Yeah, don't make us actually have to read this stuff because it is on our talk pages.
The bar is horrible, but that is not the most important thing. For me, the same applied to much of the VisualEditor, the New Forum, and much more as I am usually a pretty big nagger and moaner. But this time, a large chunk of the community have spoken up, and have decided that they don't like it, while very few (if any) have said otherwise. You have said yourself, in all of your blogs that the key to running a successful wiki community is to serve the community if you are an admin/ founder.
And, yes I accept that you are staff, and that you have extra rights, but don't let them go to your head. I am not going to have a general rant a bout all of what I don't like, although I do think that we need to have that top-bar removed. It reminds me a lot of a scene in the simpsons when two murerous aliens - kang and kodos - conquer the Earth and then both stand as two presdential canditates. Techniacally it's democracy, and it looks great in your arguments, but do we really have much of a choice.
The reason why I don't feel the need to keep the feedback to the blog os because I feel it is an important enough isseue that it shopuld be put ina place where you cannot fail to read and respond to it.
THIS HAS BEEN SENT TO ALL THE STAFF MEMBERS I COULD FIND, BECAUSE THEN YOU CANNOT IGNORE IT! (I DONT KNOW IF YOU ARE STAFF OR NOT, BUT YOU ALWAYS SEEM TO BE ON THE BLOGS AND THREADS ABOUT IT, ARGUING FOR IT)